| Title | Trust in Machine Learning Driven Clinical Decision Support Tools Among Otolaryngologists. |
| Publication Type | Journal Article |
| Year of Publication | 2024 |
| Authors | Chen H, Ma X, Rives H, Serpedin A, Yao P, Rameau A |
| Journal | Laryngoscope |
| Volume | 134 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pagination | 2799-2804 |
| Date Published | 2024 Jun |
| ISSN | 1531-4995 |
| Keywords | Adult, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Female, Humans, Laryngopharyngeal Reflux, Machine Learning, Male, Middle Aged, Otolaryngologists, Otolaryngology, Trust, United States, Vocal Cord Paralysis |
| Abstract | BACKGROUND: Machine learning driven clinical decision support tools (ML-CDST) are on the verge of being integrated into clinical settings, including in Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery. In this study, we investigated whether such CDST may influence otolaryngologists' diagnostic judgement. METHODS: Otolaryngologists were recruited virtually across the United States for this experiment on human-AI interaction. Participants were shown 12 different video-stroboscopic exams from patients with previously diagnosed laryngopharyngeal reflux or vocal fold paresis and asked to determine the presence of disease. They were then exposed to a random diagnosis purportedly resulting from an ML-CDST and given the opportunity to revise their diagnosis. The ML-CDST output was presented with no explanation, a general explanation, or a specific explanation of its logic. The ML-CDST impact on diagnostic judgement was assessed with McNemar's test. RESULTS: Forty-five participants were recruited. When participants reported less confidence (268 observations), they were significantly (pā=ā0.001) more likely to change their diagnostic judgement after exposure to ML-CDST output compared to when they reported more confidence (238 observations). Participants were more likely to change their diagnostic judgement when presented with a specific explanation of the CDST logic (pā=ā0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that otolaryngologists are susceptible to accepting ML-CDST diagnostic recommendations, especially when less confident. Otolaryngologists' trust in ML-CDST output is increased when accompanied with a specific explanation of its logic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Laryngoscope, 134:2799-2804, 2024. |
| DOI | 10.1002/lary.31260 |
| Alternate Journal | Laryngoscope |
| PubMed ID | 38230948 |
| Grant List | OT2 OD032720 / CD / ODCDC CDC HHS / United States K76 AG079040 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States OT2 OD032720 / CD / ODCDC CDC HHS / United States OT2 OD032720 / CD / ODCDC CDC HHS / United States K76 AG079040 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States |
